Follow FACTUAL NEWS on

Questions?

Kristina Dahl, principal climate scientist at UCS, breaks down the facts and exposes the twisted narratives and disinformation strategies used in a recent PragerU video approved for Florida schools.
Check out the video by Mother Jones 👇
All reactions:

573

 
296 comments
108 shares
 
Like
 
 
 
Comment
 
 
Share
 

296 comments

 
All comments

 
bullet
 
Alan C Scotch
Two of PragerU's largest donors are the hydraulic fracturing billionaires Dan and Farris Wilks. Two members of the Wilks family are on PragerU's board. The next-largest donor is the Lynde and Harry Bradley Foundation. Other donors include the Morgan Family Foundation, Fidelity Charitable Gift Fund, Donors Trust, and the Minnesota-based Sid and Carol Verdoorn Foundation, led by former C.H. Robinson CEO Sid Verdoorn. https://factualnews.org/.../Republican_Propaganda_Mills.htm
Republican Propaganda Mills
FACTUALNEWS.ORG
Republican Propaganda Mills

Republican Propaganda Mills

 

17

 
bullet
Like
 
bullet
Reply
bullet
Remove Preview
bullet
bullet
 
 
 
John Nudge
Alan C Scotch How much money have you put into Al Gore's bank account?

3

 
bullet
Like
 
bullet
Reply
bullet
bullet
 
 
 
Jones Murphy
John Nudge what is your level of education in math(esp stats) & science, compared with the overwhelming majority of scientists who agree that global warming is real? Is evolution real? How about Covid? Are you vaccinated for Covid? Is Obama a US citizen?

3

 
bullet
Like
 
bullet
Reply
bullet
bullet
 
 
 
Steven Kincaid
Jones Murphy What level of education is required to look at graphs prepared by scientists and understand them? You question others but provide no evidence at all to back your position. What's your position on 440 ppm of co2 in the atmosphere? Is it on the borderline of ending all life on earth? Do you know what co2 starvation is? What would earth be like if we had 3,000 ppm of co2 in the atmosphere? Does the climate model you're using to reinforce your stance go back more than 2,000 years? Do you know the scientific method for proving a deviation in cycles? I do. https://sciencefiles.org/.../2019/07/Historic-Co2-levels.png
sciencefiles.org
SCIENCEFILES.ORG
sciencefiles.org

sciencefiles.org

 

2

 
bullet
Like
 
bullet
Reply
bullet
bullet
 
 
 
Jones Murphy
Steven Kincaid yeah I thought so, mediocre. Enjoy your Trump U. degree in Confederate science: https://slate.com/.../trump-university-ripped-off-people...
The People Donald Trump Allegedly Ripped Off Through Trump University Look a Lot Like Trump Voters
SLATE.COM
The People Donald Trump Allegedly Ripped Off Through Trump University Look a Lot Like Trump Voters

The People Donald Trump Allegedly Ripped Off Through Trump University Look a Lot Like Trump Voters

 
 
bullet
Like
 
bullet
Reply
bullet
bullet
 
 
 
George Mason
Steven Kincaid At the annual peak in May of this year, the atmospheric CO2 level reached 424ppm. Life on earth can withstand CO2 levels exceeding 3,000 ppm. It also has been able to withstand the warming that comes with it. Just not in it's present forms. At least two past mass extinction events were caused by a massive release of CO2 from trap eruptions.
Plants can optimize growth with CO2 levels as low as 200ppm. The limiting factor in a plant's ability to sequester CO2 isn't the CO2 itself, it is the presence of Phosphorus in a usable form (Calvin Cycle). CO2 forcing in greenhouse only works if massive amounts of water and fertilizer are also used.
In terms of the graph you posted, GEOCARB III is quite an old model and is limited to inputs based on volcanic deposits and CaCO3 deposits over time. A Useful tool as a very rough estimate and still used.
Better for our current discussions are the ice core data going back 800,000 years, the timeframe for the explosion of Homo Sapiens across the planet. This May we exceeded the highest measured CO2 concentration in that timeframe (306ppm) by 118 ppm.
Instead of using GEOCARB III data, I recommend the reference below. It only goes back 50 million years, but since the first Hominid appeared on the planet 3.5 million years ago, it should suffice as a deep time reference for the world with humans in it. Interesting that the latest research indicates a drastic drop in CO2 at about the 3 million year BP timeframe.
A simple linear regression of the data from daily measurements since 1958 yields an atmospheric CO2 level of over 500 ppm by 2025.
CO2 re-radiates infrared energy at 15 microns.
CO2's lifespan in the atmosphere is at least 100 to 200 years.
A 40-million-year history of atmospheric CO2 | Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society A: Mathematical, Physical and Engineering Sciences
ROYALSOCIETYPUBLISHING.ORG
A 40-million-year history of atmospheric CO2 | Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society A: Mathematical, Physical and Engineering Sciences

A 40-million-year history of atmospheric CO2 | Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society A: Mathematical, Physical and Engineering Sciences

 
bullet
Like
 
bullet
Reply
bullet
bullet
 
 
George Mason
This site also has daily measurement data for CH4, N2O, and SF6:
Global Monitoring Laboratory - Carbon Cycle Greenhouse Gases
GML.NOAA.GOV
Global Monitoring Laboratory - Carbon Cycle Greenhouse Gases

Global Monitoring Laboratory - Carbon Cycle Greenhouse Gases

 
bullet
Like
 
bullet
Reply
bullet
bullet
 
 
 
John Nudge
Alan C Scotch Attacking the people at Prager U doesn't address the issue of climate change fraud.

3

 
bullet
Like
 
bullet
Reply
bullet
bullet
 
 
Alan C Scotch
John Nudge Scientific consensus: Climate is warming from man-made change.
I wish it weren't true but I'd be very silly not to believe 99% of scientists.
Seven Answers to Climate Contrarian Nonsense
7 Answers to Climate Contrarian Nonsense
SCIENTIFICAMERICAN.COM
7 Answers to Climate Contrarian Nonsense

7 Answers to Climate Contrarian Nonsense

 

2

 
bullet
Like
 
bullet
Reply
bullet
Remove Preview
bullet
 
bullet
 
Erica Byrne
Here are the most common myths and conspiracy theories about global warming, assembled and debunked in one place: https://skepticalscience.com/argument.php
Arguments from Global Warming Skeptics and what the science really says
SKEPTICALSCIENCE.COM
Arguments from Global Warming Skeptics and what the science really says

Arguments from Global Warming Skeptics and what the science really says

 

4

 
bullet
Like
 
bullet
Reply
bullet
 
 
1 Reply
bullet
 
Jon Dodge
Since the planet was first formed the climate has been changing. If it had not changed then no life as we know it would exist. The day the climate stops changing all life will cease to exist. What happens in the meantime? The lifeforms that adapt and evolve continue and the ones that don't simply fade away

13

 
bullet
Like
 
bullet
Reply
bullet
 
 
9 Replies
bullet
Doug Percival
Meanwhile the global warming deniers just keep regurgitating the same tired old lies, the same old ignorant nonsense, and the same old crackpot conspiracy theories that the fossil fuel industry has been spoon-feeding to weak-minded, gullible dupes for decades. They neither know nor care whether anything they post here is true. They only know that it is their DUTY as "conservatives" to repeat whatever the fake "right-wing" media tells them, like trained parrots.
bullet
Like
 
bullet
Reply
bullet
 
bullet
Christine Folk Hawk
Absolutely horrifying!!

6

 
bullet
Like
 
bullet
Reply
bullet
 
bullet
Doug Percival
Florida is now mandating that school children be forcibly indoctrinated with the fossil fuel industry's lies. Florida will soon be uninhabitable because much of the state will be under water for much of the year, much of its infrastructure will be irreperably destroyed by ultraviolent megastorms, and it will be too hot for human beings to live there, and too hot for agriculture. So it goes.
bullet
Like
 
bullet
Reply
bullet
 
bullet
 
Rand Barthel
Watch this PragerU video for the crude one-sided emotional manipulation it engages in. It's rank fossil fuel industry propaganda. I would love to know the funding sources behind this rubbish. And this is what DeSantis wants to make all school children sit through as captive audiences.

8

 
bullet
Like
 
bullet
Reply
bullet
bullet
Edited
 
 
3 Replies
bullet
 
Michael Thurston
The sad part is we can drastically reduce pollution with one simple law. We need an equality tax on all imports from places not meeting our EPA and labor standards. A large enough tax to make it cheaper to produce in country without mass pollution and child/slave labor.
bullet
Like
 
bullet
Reply
bullet
 
 
1 Reply
bullet
 
Lester Taylor
Why do some scientists get a stage to stand on while other scientists with opposite views get silenced? Who is to say which ones have the correct view , the ones with the largest voice or the ones with less backing? We can go back many years ago and find scientific facts and studies that were the holy grail but time has proven them wrong.

23

 
bullet
Like
 
bullet
Reply
bullet
 
 
19 Replies
bullet
Jack Linhart
Prageru is just right-wing propaganda!

3

 
bullet
Like
 
bullet
Reply
bullet
 
bullet
Jere Hook
So far in over 50 years the Liberal Climate Nuts have not had it correct yet. We did not die of CO2 poisoning, we did not have a new ice age in the 70s to 80s, we did not die in 10 years like predicted in the 80s, 90s, and 10 years ago, Florida is not… 
See more
 
bullet
Like
 
bullet
Reply
bullet
 
bullet
Derosnec Niaga
-Propaganda headline should have read, "Watch a master propagandist lie to the world while pretending to be a 'Climate Scientist.'"
 
bullet
Like
 
bullet
Reply
bullet
 
bullet
 
Robert Billman
Strange how 97% of all scientists agree with those providing the funding! You see, I tried following the science but it just wasn't there. Then I started to follow the money and it was there I found the science! I f you remember correctly Al Gore began with this "global warming" back in the 60's & 70's. (Didn't work then? Won't work now!) In the 60's it was also your concern that the "oil reserves" will be depleted in 10 years, we're all gonna die. Then in the 70's it was another ice age within the next 10 years, We could all perish! Now, on to the 80's. At that time all the rage was acid rain will kill all the crops in another 10 years and thousands of humans and animals will die.............. never happened! That brings us to the 90's............ oh yeah, now the big scare is the Ozone layer will be destroyed in 10 years and we could all die...... again, never happened. Now in the early 2000's it was the disappearing ice caps, remember that one? Torch that one why don't you! That brings us back to square one, but the names have changed! It's no longer Global Warming, it's now Climate change! (Or as normal human beings would call it, the seasons, spring, summer, fall and winter! Now, none of these catastrophes actually occurred however, all resulted in more regulations and more taxes! If you're not old enough to remember these environmental scams of the past you're not old enough to understand how the game is played! P.S. I'M OLD ENOUGH!
bullet
Like
 
bullet
Reply
bullet
bullet
Edited
bullet
 
 
 
Bob Holly Jr.
Robert Billman Funny how only scientists paid by the fossil fuel industry disagree with the scientific consensus.
bullet
Like
 
bullet
Reply
bullet
bullet
 
 
 
Robert Billman
Bob Holly Jr. Yeah and those pesky scientists who receive no gov't funding what-so-ever expressing their different points of view too huh? Now, if you have some sort of issue with those scientists taking what you express as nothing but taking kickbacks, maybe you could contact them and show them the errors of their ways!
bullet
Like
 
bullet
Reply
bullet
bullet
 
 
Bob Holly Jr.
Robert Billman You propose that there are 3 groups of scientists.
Those paid entirely by "the government"
Those in the employ of the fossil fuel industry
and... who is it that funds "those pesky scientists who receive no gov't funding what-so-ever"?
A question about those paid entire by "the government": which government?
bullet
Like
 
bullet
Reply
bullet
 
bullet
Michael Thurston
Who can you trust? As it is impossible to prove what a climate scientist thinks. So far they have struck out every single time at bat.
 
bullet
Like
 
bullet
Reply
bullet
 
bullet
Ivy Moser
These PragerU videos are the worst. Equating environmentalist to Nazis?!?!?

2

 
bullet
Like
 
bullet
Reply
bullet
 
bullet
 
Dennis Field
UCS needs a fact check...
 
bullet
Like
 
bullet
Reply
bullet
 
 
3 Replies
bullet
Avatar looking surprised, coming out from behind the word OMG written in red, with big eyes, mouth wide open, and holding their head with both hands
 
bullet
Like
 
bullet
Reply
bullet
 
bullet
 
Terry Hendrickson
"Climate Scientist"?🙄 You mean a weatherman? Yeah, they're so scientifically accurate.

4

 
bullet
Like
 
bullet
Reply
bullet
bullet
Edited
 
 
1 Reply
bullet
 
Bob Landon
Checking or changing the facts ?

6

 
bullet
Like
 
bullet
Reply
bullet
bullet
 
 
Christine Meleg
Bob Landon Facts are pieces of information, thoroughly tested and reviewed, once established they remain true. They can either be accepted or not. In this case the fact were never seen, just a load of bull sh-t handed out to appease the brainless governor.

4

 
bullet
Like
 
bullet
Reply
bullet
 
bullet
 
Andrew C. Smithson
Liberal climate scientist complete with agenda.

4

 
bullet
Like
 
bullet
Reply
bullet
bullet
 
 
Study links facets of schizotypy to belief in conspiracy theories
PSYPOST.ORG
Study links facets of schizotypy to belief in conspiracy theories

Study links facets of schizotypy to belief in conspiracy theories

 
bullet
Like
 
bullet
Reply
bullet
 
bullet
Dan Lockerman
This is SOOOOOO Stupid , looking back at this is going to be fun for our Grandkids to laugh at !
bullet
Like
 
bullet
Reply
bullet
 
bullet
 
Lori Johnston-Arthur
We are the carbon they want to reduce. When you see the phrase "sustainable development" think depopulation and feudalism. That so-called bought-and-paid-for "climate scientist" is a propagandist for the globalists, and the "Climate Change/Global Warming Crisis" is a lie. It's all about money, power and control.
bullet
Like
 
bullet
Reply
bullet
bullet
Edited
 
 
2 Replies
bullet
Christine Meleg
Approved for Florida schools, nothing more needs to be said. Anything even remotely resembling the truth was wiped off before it was recorded.
 
bullet
Like
 
bullet
Reply
bullet
 
bullet
 
Todd Dunning
We all agree that the Left gets their science from Mother Jones
bullet
Like
 
bullet
Reply
bullet
bullet
 
 
Wade Clark
Todd Dunning There are no such things as "the left" or "we all agree". Your entire world view is a fabrication.
bullet
Like
 
bullet
Reply
bullet
 
bullet
Meneer Sjoerd
Wasted 10 minutes and watched this purported Doctorate Climate Terrorist 'fact check'. She simply refutes without facts... just a Climate Terrorist lying as they do so well.
bullet
Like
 
bullet
Reply
bullet
 
bullet
Jerry L. Head
Union of Concerned Scientist = liberal globalist propaganda

2

 
bullet
Like
 
bullet
Reply
bullet
 
bullet
Terry L. Brown
Desantis is going to “stupid” us right out of existence! He was Alfred E. Neuman last night in look and communications!
bullet
Like
 
bullet
Reply
bullet
 
bullet
Roger Rader
Let's not forget all the Climate Change alarmists that keep buying oceanfront property, lol

2

 
bullet
Like
 
bullet
Reply
bullet
 
bullet
Joe Creaney
Most of the green extremes see humanity as the basic problem. Until they declare war and go and attack China and India they do not truly care about this issue and do not believe it. They are the ones flying on private jets virtue signaling because of their depravity.

2

 
bullet
Like
 
bullet
Reply
bullet
 
bullet
Ed Matheson
The science / reality deniers sure enjoy attacking reality with their deafening "comments"!
 
bullet
Like
 
bullet
Reply
bullet
 
bullet
 
Holly Scott
lol! NOTHING NATURE ABOUT WHAT IS GOING ON, IT'S ALL MAN MADE., FOOL
 
bullet
Like
 
bullet
Reply
bullet
 
 
4 Replies
bullet
Tommy Lucas
Propaganda post pushing fear for politics its all democrats know. America is tired of democrats lies and corruption.
bullet
Like
 
bullet
Reply
bullet
 
bullet
 
Peter Klein
Should change their name to Union of Fake Scientists.
bullet
Like
 
bullet
Reply
bullet
bullet
 
 
Erica Byrne
Every climate scientist in the world is wrong, and Trump is right? Got it.
Study links facets of schizotypy to belief in conspiracy theories
PSYPOST.ORG
Study links facets of schizotypy to belief in conspiracy theories

Study links facets of schizotypy to belief in conspiracy theories

 
bullet
Like
 
bullet
Reply
bullet
 
bullet
 
Ross Butcher
Who's climate scientist? It matters.
 
bullet
Like
 
bullet
Reply
bullet
bullet
 
 
 
Bert Sandlin
Ross Butcher - So true! Joe Biden is the only president in the 50 plus year history of the EPA to FIRE the entire EPA Science Advisory Board and replace them with his ECO-SCAMMERS. YES Joe fired all 42 members of the EPA SCIENCE ADVISORY BOARD that is every member and replaced them with his climate cronies. Next time you comment on the tainted science mention this. JOE BIDEN CRAPPED ON THE SCIENCE in addition the he INCREASED CO2 EMISSIONS in the USA and in the World.
Per the attached Tuesday, May 25, 2021 article from the Washington Times
“the Biden administration decided to terminate all 42 members of the EPA Science Advisory Board (SAB ). For the first time in SAB’s 42-year history, a new EPA administrator will receive scientific advice only from scientists that they personally appoint. It is a clear political move that truly is unprecedented.” So in less than 5 Months in office Biden fired all 42 members of the EPA Science Advisory Board and replaced all of them with his climate cronies. See attached below
Joe Biden’s purge at the EPA
WASHINGTONTIMES.COM
Joe Biden’s purge at the EPA

Joe Biden’s purge at the EPA

 
 
bullet
Like
 
bullet
Reply
bullet
bullet
 
 
Washington Times - Bias and Credibility
MEDIABIASFACTCHECK.COM
Washington Times - Bias and Credibility

Washington Times - Bias and Credibility

 
 
bullet
Like
 
bullet
Reply
bullet
 
bullet
 
Steven Stevens
If ignorance is bliss, they are promoting a state of ecstasy

11

 
bullet
Like
 
bullet
Reply
bullet
bullet
Edited
bullet
 
 
bullet
Like
 
bullet
Reply
bullet
 
bullet
Rocky Johnson
I love it when they say the forest fires are a direct climate change event. Yet ask the fire investigators and they say 75% are purposeful arson. Then there are web sites that track wild fires that go back 30 years. Guess what? 2023 is average. Also look at the weather news - they use 5 times the amount of red just from 2 years ago. When the temperatures shown are lower than two years ago, but are in red zones now, this is alarmist BS. I'm not a climate denier, but I will point out alarmists using every dishonest tools they think they can get away with before getting busted again when global warming numbers were fudged and they were caught. The US carbon footprint has fallen and I think we are doing well. China is far ahead on the polluting scale. They make up half of the entire world's carbon. No single country should be allowed to be so reckless. The US is going in the right direction, but watch out for alarmists that attack and lie too. We all saw the "Hottest Day in 120,000 Years report last week or so ago. Total BS - we have no data to draw from to make such a stupid statement. PragerU is typically level headed and that rubs the lefties the wrong way because when shown truth, they start name calling instead of proving the case. Hint when you demand to change words & meanings you lose the culture discussion. I won't call a he a her or them. When you try to pass laws mandating that, you have laws mandating slavery thought and not free thought. If we allow you to start a discussion where a he is a her and by law a fact, then we all lose the common sense discussion on anything.
bullet
Like
 
bullet
Reply
bullet
 
bullet
Bob Smith
Never could've imagined Mother Jones would be in the establishment (statist) camp..... lol
bullet
Like
 
bullet
Reply
bullet
 
bullet
Louis Iudiciani
Did anybody fact check her?
 
bullet
Like
 
bullet
Reply
bullet
 
bullet
Butch Gilliam
Plant more trees 🌳🌲. And food for starving people.
bullet
Like
 
bullet
Reply
bullet
 
bullet
Chris Gudger
The climate crisis is a complete hoax

2

 
bullet
Like
 
bullet
Reply
bullet
 
bullet
Neal Dirk
Anyone who claims we have a climate crisis is a moron or a Communist Radical Lefty who's only passion in life is to see America destroyed from within. The damage done to our children by lying about a phony climate crisis has caused millions of young people to become sad and depressed to the point that they don't want to marry or have children or live and the only thing that keeps them alive is therapy and anxiety/depression medication. Remember what Nikita Khrushchev, the Soviet Union Communist leader, said in the early 1960s about burying America from within without firing a shot. Open your eyes America before it's too late.
bullet
Like
 
bullet
Reply
bullet
 
bullet
Steve Cordell
200 years ago---"settled science" held that the best treatment for most diseases was Desanguination--and you dont know what that is OH NO have to read
“Science” held Disease allegedly was caused by “miasma”--bad smells… 
See more
bullet
Like
 
bullet
Reply
bullet
 
bullet
 
Timothy Terzin
Weird how the enemy of the free world benefits from the actions of Climate Science.

4

 
bullet
Like
 
bullet
Reply
bullet
bullet
 
 
 
Christine Meleg
Timothy Terzin Anyone who twists reality shows their true mentality, psychotic.

2

 
bullet
Like
 
bullet
Reply
bullet
bullet
 
 
Study links facets of schizotypy to belief in conspiracy theories
PSYPOST.ORG
Study links facets of schizotypy to belief in conspiracy theories

Study links facets of schizotypy to belief in conspiracy theories

 
bullet
Like
 
bullet
Reply
bullet
 
bullet
Tim Banis
“Climate scientist”. Haha. That’s a good one.

2

 
bullet
Like
 
bullet
Reply
bullet
 
bullet
 
bullet
 
bullet
The Trick review: How the Climategate scandal rocked the world
NEWSCIENTIST.COM
The Trick review: How the Climategate scandal rocked the world

The Trick review: How the Climategate scandal rocked the world

 
bullet
Like
 
bullet
Reply
bullet
 
bullet
NOAA Scientists Falsify Data to Dupe World Leaders on Climate Change
OBSERVER.COM
NOAA Scientists Falsify Data to Dupe World Leaders on Climate Change

NOAA Scientists Falsify Data to Dupe World Leaders on Climate Change

 
bullet
Like
 
bullet
Reply
bullet
 
bullet
IPCC: the dirty tricks climate scientists faced in three decades since first report
THECONVERSATION.COM
IPCC: the dirty tricks climate scientists faced in three decades since first report

IPCC: the dirty tricks climate scientists faced in three decades since first report

 
bullet
Like
 
bullet
Reply
bullet
 
bullet
 
bullet
IPCC Researchers Admit Global Warming Fraud - The New American
THENEWAMERICAN.COM
IPCC Researchers Admit Global Warming Fraud - The New American

IPCC Researchers Admit Global Warming Fraud - The New American

 
bullet
Like
 
bullet
Reply
bullet
 
bullet
Terry Gladden Sr.
Unicorn Hunters on steroids !!
bullet
Like
 
bullet
Reply
bullet
 
bullet
 
Barry Shildneck
Who's fact-checking the fact-checkers? I didn't look at the video, simply because there have been far too many cases where (other) "fact-checkers" have been proven wrong. It could be that this one of the exceptions, but I refuse to be "bullied" into believing every supposed "expert", when I've seen so many instances to the contrary. 🙁

12

 
bullet
Like
 
bullet
Reply
bullet
 
 
16 Replies
bullet
 
bullet
 
Tony Wright
Since the climate alarmists are the chciken littles with fraudulent predictions. I suggest the SUN is the cause of all global warming and CO2 is an NPC. It happens to be the building block of all life which if you are anti population you would deprive the atmosphere of it, which you policies would do.

3

 
bullet
Like
 
bullet
Reply
bullet
bullet
 
 
Rod Pile
Tony Wright Thank god we have FB scientists like you who know more than the world class researchers and scienitsts at NASA.smh https://climate.nasa.gov/global-warming-vs-climate-change/
What Is Climate Change?
CLIMATE.NASA.GOV
What Is Climate Change?

What Is Climate Change?

 
bullet
Like
 
bullet
Reply
bullet
bullet
 
 
Bob Holly Jr.
Tony Wright if the sun is the cause of global warming, wouldn't that mean that Mercury, the planet closest to the sun, should be hotter than Venus, the second closest planet to the sun, right?
bullet
Like
 
bullet
Reply
bullet
 
bullet
Jeff Harper
It's an insult, "Prager you".
 
bullet
Like
 
bullet
Reply
bullet
 
bullet
 
Chris Gustav Halverson
Here's the thing about "climate scientists": https://youtu.be/l90FpjPGLBE
Hot or Not: Steven Koonin Questions Conventional Climate Science and Methodology| Uncommon Knowledge
YOUTUBE.COM
Hot or Not: Steven Koonin Questions Conventional Climate Science and Methodology| Uncommon Knowledge

Hot or Not: Steven Koonin Questions Conventional Climate Science and Methodology| Uncommon Knowledge

 

2

 
bullet
Like
 
bullet
Reply
bullet
bullet
 
 
 
Jeff Harper
Chris Gustav Halverson oukd you find a,study instead of a YouTube video. They are highly unreliable.

2

 
bullet
Like
 
bullet
Reply
bullet
bullet
 
 
 
Christine Meleg
Jeff Harper He is too busy teaching how to write haiku instead of learning about the real world.
 
bullet
Like
 
bullet
Reply
bullet
bullet
 
 
 
Chris Gustav Halverson
Jeff Harper: Dr. Steven Koonin, an atmospheric physicist who was a member of the Obama administration, is considered the world’s leading authority on the way energy radiates from Earth’s atmosphere, exactly the mechanism of greenhouse gases, which cause warming by reducing the amount of solar energy radiating back into space. I found it very enlightening. It makes me worry even less than before about global warming. For example, it turns out that even doubling the current amount of carbon dioxide in Earth’s atmosphere will increase the amount of solar energy the atmosphere retains by only 1%. Did you watch the video before criticizing it?
bullet
Like
 
bullet
Reply
bullet
bullet
 
 
Chris Gustav Halverson
Interesting comment, Christine. Haiku is one of my favorite poetic forms and I do feature it in my teaching. What do you have against poetry?
bullet
Like
 
bullet
Reply
bullet
bullet
 
 
Christine Meleg
Chris Gustav Halverson Here's the thing about science deniers', they scream the loudest and can never understand they are the problem. go ahead and accept the "facts from an entertainment site" it proves what I stated, science deniers are mentally ill. Teaching writing is a far cry from being a scientist, I am a scientist and have studied the effects of Global Warming for decades, findings published with further studies from the national Audubon Society.
 
bullet
Like
 
bullet
Reply
bullet
 
bullet
Facts Rock
PragerU is a joke. They use vague, misleading, divisive posts to promote far right propaganda and are now asking for donations to promote more biased products in schools. It's disgusting.
 
bullet
Like
 
bullet
Reply
bullet
 
bullet
 
Dave Harpe
Prager DOES NOT belong in our schools!
By the way, what does that "U" mean anyway, uninformed, untrue, underhanded, or what?

6

 
bullet
Like
 
bullet
Reply
bullet
bullet
 
 

2

 
bullet
Like
 
bullet
Reply
bullet
bullet
 
 

2

 
bullet
Like
 
bullet
Reply
bullet
 
bullet
Donna Santiago
Floriduh is going to have some really stupid students!!
 
bullet
Like
 
bullet
Reply
bullet
 
bullet
 
Paul Airola
Fact, weren't scientists paid by people like Al Gore and others to push the climate change narrative?

3

 
bullet
Like
 
bullet
Reply
bullet
bullet
 
 
bullet
 
 
Dave Harpe
Paul Airola Here are some real facts. Al Gore is not a billionaire, and has nothing to gain if people buy a car from Elon Musk. Big oil has a lot to gain if we believe what you are saying, and spent billions to promote such ideas.

4

 
bullet
Like
 
bullet
Reply
bullet
 
bullet
 
John Roy Sr
I strongly suspect the Union of Concerned Scientists to be just one
more covert single issue special interest group owned & operated by
the Democrat-Bolshevik intelligentsia. If they were honest, if they had
any "science" they would have told us what mankind did, just what
anthropogenic activity or biological impact ended that last ice age
12,000-10,000 years ago.
*** I call it the coming-ice-age-global-warming-climate-change
because over the decades their has varied from one extreme to
the other. Each a crisis.

5

 
bullet
Like
 
bullet
Reply
bullet
bullet
 
 
Robert Billman
John Roy Sr 100% right on, read my previous comment!
 
bullet
Like
 
bullet
Reply
bullet
bullet
 
 
Doug Percival
John Roy Sr is a mental slave of the fossil fuel industry's propanda machine. In this post he robotically regurgitates several of the crude, clumsy, clownish lies and crackpot conspiracy theories that they spoon-feed to weak-minded, ignorant, gullible dupes who like to think they are smarter than all the scientists in the world.
bullet
Like
 
bullet
Reply
bullet
 
bullet
Marlene Pettine
PragerU is a farce. Perfect for De Santis ,the Ultimate Farce! And, that is the nicest thing one could say about this waana be dictator!

7

 
bullet
Like
 
bullet
Reply
bullet
 
bullet
 
Jim Karlock
Here is the evidence you are ignoring:
1.----
THE CLIMATE HAS ALWAYS CHANGED!
5000 years ago, there was the Egyptian 1st Unified Kingdom warm period
4400 years ago, there was the Egyptian old kingdom warm period.
3000 years ago, there was the Minoan Warm period. It was warmer than now WITHOUT fossil fuels.
Then 1000 years later, there was the Roman warm period. It was warmer than now WITHOUT fossil fuels.
Then 1000 years later, there was the Medieval warm period. It was warmer than now WITHOUT fossil fuels.
1000 years later, came our current warm period.
Climate alarmists are claiming that whatever caused those earlier warm periods suddenly quit causing warm periods, only to be replaced by man's CO2, perfectly in time for the cycle of warmth every 1000 years to stay on schedule. Not very believable.
The entire climate scam crumbles on this one observation because it shows that there is nothing unusual about today's temperature and thus CO2 is not causing warming or any unusual climate effects that are frequently blamed on warming.
Evidence that those warm periods actually occurred:
Evidence that the Roman & Medieval warm periods were global:
2------------
1. Our current climate started warming 200 years BEFORE man’s CO2 emissions started to rise . NOT before.
2. Previous Holocene warm periods were warmer than now.
3. Solar fits climate better than CO2
4. There is nothing unusual about today’s climate compared to before man emitted CO2.
5. Recent warming is a same rate as the late 1800s but now with much more of man’s CO2. (More of a cause should cause more effect.)
6. Man’s CO2 has never been proven to cause dangerous warming.
7. Man emits only 5% of annual CO2. Plus CO2 only causes 9-26% of greenhouse effect.
8. Human CO2 release warms the climate less than 0.03◦C https://arxiv.org/pdf/2304.01245.pdf
See DebunkingClimate.com for evidence
3.----------
1. The IPCC says the earth warmed less than 0.8 degree from 1850 up to 2012. See Pg. 209 of the IPCC WG1AR5_all_final.pdf
2. Man only emits 6% of total annual CO2 emissions (Nature emits 94%). Add the numbers on the NASA diagram of the carbon cycle.
3. CO2 only causes 26-32% of the greenhouse effect. (H2O is 60-75%) see wikipedia greenhouse_effect page and Table 3 of: Bulletin of the American Meteorological Society Vol. 78, No. 2, February 1997
4. We do not have enough data to say that hurricanes have increased. pg 178 of WG1AR5_all_final.pdf
5. We do not have enough data to say that storms have increased. pg 178 of WG1AR5_all_final.pdf
6. Sea level has been rising for centuries, it HAS NOT RISEN FASTER recently. Page 306 WG1AR5_all_final.pdf
7. There is little, if any, global scale changes in the magnitude or frequency of floods. pg 230 of WG1AR5_all_final.pdf
8. Confidence is low for a global-scale observed trend in drought or dryness pg 178 of WG1AR5_all_final.pdf
9. Long-term prediction of future climate states is not possible. Page 774 of IPCC third Assessment Report (2001) Section 14.2.2.2
In view of this, why does anyone think we have a climate problem?
4------------------
Here is the climate truth from genuine scientists:
Will happer & Richard Lindzen:
Lindzen on hydrodynamics of climate: https://youtu.be/KhCKYvETYDc
Past Was Warmer
DEBUNKINGCLIMATE.COM
Past Was Warmer

Past Was Warmer

 
bullet
Like
 
bullet
Reply
bullet
bullet
 
 
 
Image: Energy balance points to man-made climate change – Physics World
GOOGLE.COM
Image: Energy balance points to man-made climate change – Physics World

Image: Energy balance points to man-made climate change – Physics World

 
 
bullet
Like
 
bullet
Reply
bullet
bullet
 
 
 
Jim Karlock
Jeff Harper --Do any of those contain actual evidence that man's CO2 is causing SERIOUS global warming?
If so , please post it here.
I note your first graph is from a well known fake science site. See DebunkingSkepticalScience.com
Your second graph presumes that the failed climate models are accurate and that we KNOW ALL THINGS that affect climate (we DO NOT)
Home
DEBUNKINGSKEPTICALSCIENCE.COM
Home

Home

 
bullet
Like
 
bullet
Reply
bullet
bullet
 
 
 
Jeff Harper
Jim Karlock where is your evidence?
bullet
Like
 
bullet
Reply
bullet
bullet
 
 
 
Jim Karlock
Jeff Harper --" where is your evidence?"
WOW!!! You didn't even bother to read my post before criticizing it!!
READ THE POST - the evidence is linked in the first section. Each claim after that has links to evidence. But you have to learn how to click … 
See more
bullet
Like
 
bullet
Reply
bullet
bullet
 
 
Jeff Harper
Jim Karlock "skeptical sciemce"? Really?
From a scientific point of view, skeptics judge ideas on many criteria, including falsifiability,[16] Occam's Razor,[17] Morgan's Canon[18] and explanatory power, as well as the degree to which their predictions match experimental results.[
bullet
Like
 
bullet
Reply
bullet
bullet
 
 
 
Image: Human fingerprints on climate change rule out natural cycles
GOOGLE.COM
Image: Human fingerprints on climate change rule out natural cycles

Image: Human fingerprints on climate change rule out natural cycles

 
 
bullet
Like
 
bullet
Reply
bullet
bullet
 
 
Jim Karlock
Jeff Harper --"Images"
How does that image prove that man's CO2 is causing serious global warming?
bullet
Like
 
bullet
Reply
bullet
bullet
 
 
 
Is Climate Change Anthropogenic? — Planetary Health For Busy People
PLANETARYHEALTHFORBUSYPEOPLE.COM
Is Climate Change Anthropogenic? — Planetary Health For Busy People

Is Climate Change Anthropogenic? — Planetary Health For Busy People

 
 
bullet
Like
 
bullet
Reply
bullet
bullet
 
 
Jim Karlock
Jeff Harper --"Planetary health"
How does that prove that man's CO2 is causing serious global warming?
bullet
Like
 
bullet
Reply
bullet
bullet
Edited
 
bullet
Jack Voelker
"Climate scientist"??? I.e., expert at landing big-dollar grants and spouting the party line.
bullet
Like
 
bullet
Reply
bullet
 
bullet
Stephen Kahofer
GOP BRAINWASHING
bullet
Like
 
bullet
Reply
bullet
 
bullet
 
Mike Davis
I don't trust anything from prageru.

27

 
bullet
Like
 
bullet
Reply
bullet
bullet
 
 
Rich Sahlin
Mike Davis I trust Mother Jones even less

6

 
bullet
Like
 
bullet
Reply
bullet
bullet
 
 
Robert Billman
Mike Davis Most libtards don't! Funny how some facts triggers libtards!
bullet
Like
 
bullet
Reply
bullet
bullet
 
 
Erica Byrne
Trump supporters think that PragerU and TrumpU are just like real universities.
 
bullet
Like
 
bullet
Reply
bullet
 
bullet
Jeanette Doane
Bunch of rich Epstein island lovers telling me about climate change. 😂
 
bullet
Like
 
bullet
Reply
bullet
 
bullet
Scott Stillwell
LOL! Complete BS from the plantation's certified propaganda experts. "Renewables" are in fact expensive, unreliable and cannot power a modern free world.
bullet
Like
 
bullet
Reply
bullet
 
bullet
Duane Stuart
🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣Climate Scientist😹😹😹😹😹😹😹😹😹😹😹😹

2

 
bullet
Like
 
bullet
Reply
bullet
 
bullet
Tony Abramski
Climate Scam It's about the money they could care less about the kids
bullet
Like
 
bullet
Reply
bullet
 
bullet
 
Michael Driskill
I would believe Prager U long before I would believe a left wing union of "scientists".

7

 
bullet
Like
 
bullet
Reply
bullet
bullet
 
 
 
Sue Dettloff
Michael Driskill Ah, another genius!
 
bullet
Like
 
bullet
Reply
bullet
bullet
 
 
 
Michael Driskill
Sue Dettloff ......and the unicorn you rode in on!!!!!!
bullet
Like
 
bullet
Reply
bullet
bullet
 
 
Sue Dettloff
Michael Driskill Ah, you would believe in those. Shows your scientific knowledge.
 
bullet
Like
 
bullet
Reply
bullet
bullet
 
 
Jeff Harper
Michael Driskill therein lies the problem. Prager U is not science and has produced no evidence. You have decided that truth is not worth looking for anymore. Sad.

2

 
bullet
Like
 
bullet
Reply
bullet
 
bullet
 
Eva Armstrong
This is scary. Other southern states are starting to follow. Why do they insist on dumbing down students? Better to control?

37

 
bullet
Like
 
bullet
Reply
bullet
bullet
 
 
 
Don Beeman
Eva Armstrong The dumbing down of students was done by making more airtight schools with higher exhaled CO2 inside with poor ventilation.
Search for Berkley Labs 1,000 ppm CO2 impairs learning.
The “class size” crap should give everyone a clue. Most schools with a class of 20 students has the CO2 concentration as if 46 students were present. There are 26 phantoms. I guess that’s a class size problem!
Students are taught what to think not how to think it seems. How much climate lie indoctrination goes on?
Curious facts - in the 1970s when global warming suddenly appeared to force tighter homes, schools, etc. on us with higher exhaled CO2 inside and poor ventilation, “peer review” was instituted to stifle the truth.
The energy savings from tighter buildings is a false savings. More energy use actually results. I explain why in what I wrote about the CDC.
Global warming has all the markings of a classic con job. “Look up there,” at the atmosphere, while the real problem is in your nose.
What is the most important thing about CO2 humans need to know? The common answer just shows what almost fifty years of brainwashing, of repeating a lie over and over, can do.
No gas makes a greenhouse warm. That is done by the greenhouse GLASS. No gas has the properties of glass. The atmosphere expands with heat leaving more space for snow, rain, and cold air to blow through the CO2 molecules. Not so with greenhouse GLASS. The atmosphere expanding also puts more of the air higher where it is colder for more cooling.
The most important thing for humans to know about CO2 is that it is a waste product of our bodies, and we don’t like any of them in our noses in greater concentrations and for longer periods of time. No matter the source, all CO2 can have the same adverse effects on our physical and mental health. The valuable lessons that prompted the Tenement House Acts and a revolution in building construction have been reversed and are now used to cripple Americans and undermine America with our own exhaled CO2.
The lies about the climate are the club that is used to force Americans to accept and endure higher exhaled CO2 indoors in tighter poorly ventilated buildings. More energy use actually results.
Over forty years of CDC and government crimes against humanity. Millions of indoor exhaled CO2 damaged and dead children and adults
Time to revisit Nuremberg!
Conspairacy -- The Evil CDC
CONSPAIRACY.COM
Conspairacy -- The Evil CDC

Conspairacy -- The Evil CDC

 

3

 
bullet
Like
 
bullet
Reply
bullet
bullet
 
 
Suzy Qu
Don Beeman we can’t fix stupid but the conspiracy theories make it easier to spot.🤪
 
bullet
Like
 
bullet
Reply
bullet
bullet
 
 
bullet
Like
 
bullet
Reply
bullet
bullet
 
 
 
Kelly Pennypacker
Not everything we're told about "climate change" by the "experts" is true. What Prager U is saying probably has far more truth to it than what this person is saying. I know that's hard to believe because people like to think they can trust these people but they can't.

5

 
bullet
Like
 
bullet
Reply
bullet
bullet
 
 
 
Suzy Qu
Kelly Pennypacker we can’t fix stupid but the PragerU defenders make it easier to spot.🤪

3

 
bullet
Like
 
bullet
Reply
bullet
bullet
 
 
 
Kelly Pennypacker
Suzy Qu rather than responding to someone's comment the way you and other climate change believers do, why not try saying something intelligent with actual meaning? It's worth a try. Then maybe you'd have some credibility. As it is you seem to be ju… 
See more
bullet
Like
 
bullet
Reply
bullet
bullet
 
 
 
Kevin Sullivan
Suzy Qu it is obvious that you cannot fix stupid because you are so broken.
bullet
Like
 
bullet
Reply
bullet
bullet
 
 
Bob Holly Jr.
Kelly Pennypacker Prager U has never intentionally told the truth in any of their videos.
You have to be motivatedly stupid to believe otherwise.
bullet
Like
 
bullet
Reply
bullet
bullet
 
 
 
Michael Driskill
Eva Armstrong Southern states aren't being dumbed down. Our parents have had enough of left wing efforts to groom and control students. Prager U speaks the truth as opposed to "leftists with a tree" fear mongering.

3

 
bullet
Like
 
bullet
Reply
bullet
bullet
 
 
Lolly Morrow
Michael Driskill you mean you have had enough of Teaching facts and truth? I guess you are all happy with your made up stuff. What exactly have the left wing been grooming students for.? higher education perhaps? Maybe how to make a decision based on r… 
See more
 
bullet
Like
 
bullet
Reply
bullet
bullet
 
 
bullet
Like
 
bullet
Reply
bullet
bullet
 
 
bullet
 
 
 
Steve Cordell
Eva Armstrong DUMBING DOWN began when the left took over Dept of Ed 1979 twit

2

 
bullet
Like
 
bullet
Reply
bullet
bullet
 
 
 
Ray E Pelletier
Steve Cordell the dumbing down started when conservatives started censoring what teachers could teach.
bullet
Like
 
bullet
Reply
bullet
bullet
 
 
 
Bill Frantz
Ray E Pelletier You like drag queens in schools?
bullet
Like
 
bullet
Reply
bullet
bullet
 
 
Bob Holly Jr.
Bill Frantz I like drag queens a lot more than active shooters in schools.
bullet
Like
 
bullet
Reply
bullet
bullet
 
 
Erica Byrne
Most parents in Southern states want their children to receive a first-rate education, but Republicans see that as a threat, especially if critical-thinking skills were to be taught.
 
bullet
Like
 
bullet
Reply
bullet
 
bullet
Rich Sahlin
LMFAO, Mother Jones is so far to the left it's a miracle they haven't tipped over yet.

2

 
bullet
Like
 
bullet
Reply
bullet
 
bullet
 
Don Guzan
Biggest $$$ grab ever!

9

 
bullet
Like
 
bullet
Reply
bullet
bullet
 
 
Scott Stillwell
It's for complete control.

2

 
bullet
Like
 
bullet
Reply
bullet
 
bullet
 
Kevn Kelly
Deceitful, fear mongering RENT SEEKER

4

 
bullet
Like
 
bullet
Reply
bullet
bullet
 
 
Paul Chernick
Kevn Kelly Prager? Definitely

2

 
bullet
Like
 
bullet
Reply
bullet
 
bullet
Matt Campbell
UNION OF DUMASS LEFTISTS

3

 
bullet
Like
 
bullet
Reply
bullet
 
bullet
 
Daria Rawley
Can we ban PragerU already?

8

 
bullet
Like
 
bullet
Reply
bullet
bullet
 
 
Michael Driskill
Daria Rawley Typical left wing tactic. Ban anything opposed to your agenda!

5

 
bullet
Like
 
bullet
Reply
bullet
 
bullet
 
Tom Ruppen
Why are China and India exempt from the Paris Climate Accords?
What was the Carbon Footprint of the 1000 private Jets that flew to Davos for the Climate Conference?
Climate FRAUDSTERS.

9

 
bullet
Like
 
bullet
Reply
bullet
bullet
 
 
 
Vskul Pathman
Tom Ruppen they refuse to sign.
bullet
Like
 
bullet
Reply
bullet
bullet
 
 
Tom Ruppen
Vskul Pathman UN said China and India are developing economies. Therefore they are exempt.
bullet
Like
 
bullet
Reply
bullet
 
bullet
Richard L Webb
UOCS are the ones pushing a hoax.They use their own twisted ideas as proof of their position, when basic physical science and back yard weather reporting disproves them.

6

 
bullet
Like
 
bullet
Reply
bullet
 
bullet
Don Beeman
Alarming, eh? Fact check this -
Curious facts - in the 1970s when global warming suddenly appeared to force tighter homes, schools, etc. on us with higher exhaled CO2 inside and poor ventilation, “peer review” was instituted to stifle the truth.
The energy savings from tighter buildings is a false savings. More energy use actually results. I explain why in what I wrote about the CDC.
Global warming has all the markings of a classic con job. “Look up there,” at the atmosphere, while the real problem is in your nose.
What is the most important thing about CO2 humans need to know? The common answer just shows what almost fifty years of brainwashing, of repeating a lie over and over, can do.
No gas makes a greenhouse warm. That is done by the greenhouse GLASS. No gas has the properties of glass. The atmosphere expands with heat leaving more space for snow, rain, and cold air to blow through the CO2 molecules. Not so with greenhouse GLASS. The atmosphere expanding also puts more of the air higher where it is colder for more cooling.
The most important thing for humans to know about CO2 is that it is a waste product of our bodies, and we don’t like any of them in our noses in greater concentrations and for longer periods of time. No matter the source, all CO2 can have the same adverse effects on our physical and mental health. The valuable lessons that prompted the Tenement House Acts and a revolution in building construction have been reversed and are now used to cripple Americans and undermine America with our own exhaled CO2.
The lies about the climate are the club that is used to force Americans to accept and endure higher exhaled CO2 indoors in tighter poorly ventilated buildings. More energy use actually results.
Over forty years of CDC and government crimes against humanity. Millions of indoor exhaled CO2 damaged and dead children and adults
Time to revisit Nuremberg!
Conspairacy -- The Evil CDC
CONSPAIRACY.COM
Conspairacy -- The Evil CDC

Conspairacy -- The Evil CDC

 

2

 
bullet
Like
 
bullet
Reply
bullet
 
bullet
 
Mark Egdall
Please teach the children what the measurements tell us. Global warming is real. The planet is getting hotter and hotter. At a magnitude and speed which is unprecedented in human history. Measurements show the unique chemical signature of fossil fuel burning and the resultant increase in heat-trapping carbon dioxide in our atmosphere. We see the effects in more and more extreme weather events across our planet -- flooding, droughts, wildfires, rising oceans and seas, heat waves.

14

 
bullet
Like
 
bullet
Reply
bullet
bullet
 
 
Richard L Webb
Mark Egdall Carbon based global warming is a farce.

6

 
bullet
Like
 
bullet
Reply
bullet
bullet
 
 
Terry Doyle
Mark Egdall it is the start of the 2nd coming when all the elements are rebelling against our wickedness- so there is nothing we can do to prevent this. even if america reduced our co2 to zero, it wouldnt make up for china, russia, and india. they are not going to do it because it would ruin their economy...
 
bullet
Like
 
bullet
Reply
bullet
bullet
 
 
Matt Campbell
Mark Egdall FLY TO CHINA AND TELL THEM TO STOP BURNING COAL

3

 
bullet
Like
 
bullet
Reply
bullet
 
bullet
Bill Gillespie
So is Greta still auditioning for The Exorcist?

4

 
bullet
Like
 
bullet
Reply
bullet
bullet
Edited
 
bullet
 
Bill Gillespie
Ah, 49 comments, but fb has selected the "most relevant" for me - which amount to just my own three comments! Is fb concerned I'd dismantle the goofball comments, and derail the climate alarmist narrative? How pathetic, but so like the Left.

4

 
bullet
Like
 
bullet
Reply
bullet
bullet
 
 
Glenn Braun
Bill Gillespie you should be able to click on "All Comments" and see everything again. But so like the Right to jump to conclusions and blame everyone else.
bullet
Like
 
bullet
Reply
bullet
bullet
Edited
 
bullet
 
Bill Gillespie
How laughable. Ms. Dahl first attacks the video because it's protagonist is - white! It gets more goofy from there. But no hard science is presented. A desperate Leftist try to maintain its goofy narrative which is falling apart because it lacks factual support.

8

 
bullet
Like
 
bullet
Reply
bullet
bullet
 
 
Image: Human fingerprints on climate change rule out natural cycles
GOOGLE.COM
Image: Human fingerprints on climate change rule out natural cycles

Image: Human fingerprints on climate change rule out natural cycles

 
bullet
Like
 
bullet
Reply
bullet
bullet
 
 
Image: Energy balance points to man-made climate change – Physics World
GOOGLE.COM
Image: Energy balance points to man-made climate change – Physics World

Image: Energy balance points to man-made climate change – Physics World

 
bullet
Like
 
bullet
Reply
bullet
 
bullet
Les Arbuckle
There is absolutely no money in saying that there is not a climate crisis.
Dr John Clauser lecture on climate and misinformation
YOUTUBE.COM
Dr John Clauser lecture on climate and misinformation

Dr John Clauser lecture on climate and misinformation

 

2

 
bullet
Like
 
bullet
Reply
bullet
 
bullet
Bill Gillespie
So you want it banned? How amusing.

2

 
bullet
Like
 
bullet
Reply
bullet
 
bullet
Bill Gillespie
Climate hustling is almost as lucrative as race hustling.

8

 
bullet
Like
 
bullet
Reply
bullet
 
bullet
Stephen Erwin
Too much misinformation to know what to believe from the climate alarmists.

2

 
bullet
Like
 
bullet
Reply
bullet
 
bullet
 
Bill Sundling
Climate scientists sold their souls for funding. http://www.debunkingclimate.com/...
Home
DEBUNKINGCLIMATE.COM
Home

Home

 

8

 
bullet
Like
 
bullet
Reply
bullet
bullet
 
 
George Mason
Bill Sundling I have received three grants for doing scientific research:
1. Department of energy researching waste streams as sources of energy. That one paid for groceries and misc.
2. Soil Conservation Service researching Phosphorus and Nitrogen loading in river sediments. That one paid for a little bit more.
In both cases, I had to have another job as well as my National Guard pay.
The third was funded through the SEPM by the US oil industry working on micropaleontology (conodont asemblages) to determin the age of shale bearing rock formations. I rebuilt my house on that one.
Anyone who thinks that scientists are getting rich off of government research is living in fantasy land.

3

 
bullet
Like
 
bullet
Reply
bullet
bullet
 
 
Jeff Harper
Bill Sundling "debunking climate change"? 🤣😂🤣😂🤣😂🤣😂🤪
bullet
Like
 
bullet
Reply
bullet
 
bullet
 
Sam Davis
Like your disinformation strategy?

2

 
bullet
Like
 
bullet
Reply
bullet
bullet
 
 
Kevin Christensen
Sam Davis OK, fake account.
 
 
bullet
Brad Goff
Mother Jones? AYFKM? The posterchild for extremism, immediately destroys any credibility

4

 
bullet
Like
 
bullet
Reply
bullet
 
bullet
 
Michael Lennerth
Climate change is thee biggest scam our government is running right now.wake up people they going enslave you by not letting outside,absolute control

13

 
bullet
Like
 
bullet
Reply
bullet
bullet
 
 
Dawn Champlin
Michael Lennerth, Holy crap on a cracker! Pun intended! 🙄
 
bullet
Like
 
bullet
Reply
bullet
bullet
 
 
Jones Murphy
Michael Lennerth what is your level of education in math(esp stats) & science, compared with the overwhelming majority of scientists who agree that global warming is real? Is evolution real? How about Covid? Are you vaccinated for Covid? Is Obama a US citizen?

2

 
bullet
Like
 
bullet
Reply
bullet
bullet
 
 
Sage Anderson
Michael Lennerth , Ohhhh, Did you miss Out on your premium membership in the (1960's) John BIRCH Society and the Storming of Our Nation's Capitol 》The Dangerous Weaponization of Radical Rabid reich-wing proto-fascist Rhetoric Is &- has been a core element of Trump’s Demagoguery from Day-1*
Every race-baiting, scapegoating, progressive-demonizing word that’s ever come out of Trumpf’s mouth—every insane, right-wing conspiracy theory let loose on social platforms, or promoted by morally-bankrupted media scumbags like Carlson, Ingraham or Bannon—have all been intended to make the pathetically-brainwashed, embarrassing clowns shown in this meme’s photo as ANGRY as possible, in the hopes of inciting wide-scale violence in this country.
EACH of them are poisoning the present-day social fabric our nation with the same relentless, hate-filled propaganda that set Germany afire in 1933 with unimaginable cruelty and hatefulness towards the same groups of innocent human beings targeted by present-day MAGA cultists.
What an utter dishonor to every brave soldier who bled to death on the shores of Normandy to fight the evils of fascism which present-day Republicans are shamelessly inciting us towards as they lose their grip on power—the very same soldiers referred to as “losers” by a five-time draft-dodging, multiply-indicted ex-President—whose appalling rhetoric has sparked a massive, positive outrage amongst a decent, sensible and growing majority in this nation no longer burdened with complacency. 》 https://www.rawstory.com/trump-jan-6-2664004726/...
'Like Jan. 6 all over again': Expert warns Trump is following familiar pattern as threats of violence grow
RAWSTORY.COM
'Like Jan. 6 all over again': Expert warns Trump is following familiar pattern as threats of violence grow

'Like Jan. 6 all over again': Expert warns Trump is following familiar pattern as threats of violence grow

 

2

 
bullet
Like
 
bullet
Reply
bullet
 
bullet
 
John Nudge
"Climate scientist." This is the kind of person Al Gore cited for his global warming scam, and who provided Gore with his bogus statistics.

16

 
bullet
Like
 
bullet
Reply
bullet
bullet
 
 
 
Sage Anderson
John Nudge-""trickle Down"- economics &- science are Bogus, Bloviating bullllsshht Bombast from the Bizarre basement Bunker Brigade of Alex-Jones, Smucker Carlson, &- The Radical Rabid reich-wing of Prager U the Koch Foundation &- every Oil&-Gas Billionaire- Power Broker- Contributor to the Ethically DEVOID &- Corrupt Retrumplican Tribulation Tribal Cult 》

5

 
bullet
Like
 
bullet
Reply
bullet
bullet
 
 
 
Steven Kincaid
Sage Anderson That's a whole lot of stupid in one run-on sentence especially from a Nazi. Run along an fight the Russians little azov.
bullet
Like
 
bullet
Reply
bullet
bullet
 
 
 
Sage Anderson
Steven Kincaid - Are you a Bizarre basement Bunker Brigade::bullyBoy"- of Alex-Jones, or Sniveling, shuffling syncophant of Smucker Carlson:- Your profile has NOTHING but a Monster Truck- to get your cognitive Incapacitaties- occupied &' As I am a Veteran, and NOTHING of your Faux- Bullshhtt profile has any credibility- your Troll.Azzz-is - 🚮
 
bullet
Like
 
bullet
Reply
bullet
bullet
 
 
 
Russia’s Top Five Persistent Disinformation Narratives - United States Department of State
STATE.GOV
Russia’s Top Five Persistent Disinformation Narratives - United States Department of State

Russia’s Top Five Persistent Disinformation Narratives - United States Department of State

 
 
bullet
Like
 
bullet
Reply
bullet
bullet
 
 
 
Bud MacIntyre
Sage Anderson is that all.... ???
 
bullet
Like
 
bullet
Reply
bullet
bullet
 
 
Steven Kincaid
Sage Anderson Remember when they asked Zelensky if the Azov were nazis and he said "they are who they are". I'll bet you believe that means they're not nazis... bootlicker
bullet
Like
 
bullet
Reply
bullet
bullet
 
 
 
Jones Murphy
John Nudge what is your level of education in math(esp stats) & science, compared with the overwhelming majority of scientists who agree that global warming is real? Is evolution real? How about Covid? Are you vaccinated for Covid? Is Obama a US citizen?

5

 
bullet
Like
 
bullet
Reply
bullet
bullet
 
 
Sam Davis
Jones Murphy I can see your level of education is very low with your comment
 
bullet
Like
 
bullet
Reply
bullet
 
bullet
 
Thomas Alan Hanson
What an absurd video! The narrator often throws in the word "right" at the end of a sentence, making her sound like an inarticulate adolescent. She ignores that fact that many esteemed scientists disagree strongly with the "consensus," and that the best-known of them are professors emeritus, who don't depend on funding and who don't care what their erstwhile colleagues think. (Lindzen at M.I.T. and Happer at Princeton come to mind.) -- There is no climate crisis: annual deaths from natural disasters, most of which are climate-related, have plummeted by more than 90% in the past 100 years: https://ourworldindata.org/natural-disasters -- And the climate has very often changed FAR more rapidly than it is changing now: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dansgaard-Oeschger_event - This professor has been successfully indoctrinated -- "right"?
Natural Disasters
OURWORLDINDATA.ORG
Natural Disasters

Natural Disasters

 

20

 
bullet
Like
 
bullet
Reply
bullet
bullet
 
 
Jones Murphy
Thomas Alan Hanson what is your level of education in math(esp stats) & science, compared with the overwhelming majority of scientists who agree that global warming is real? Is evolution real? How about Covid? Are you vaccinated for Covid? Is Obama a US citizen?

12

 
bullet
Like
 
bullet
Reply
bullet
bullet
Edited
bullet
 
 
 
George Mason
Thomas Alan Hanson Happer and Lindzen, the poster children for the denialism movement. Neither one a climatologist, both one-trick ponies. Happer for spectroscopy and Lindzen for photochemistry. Both received damning reviews from their peers. Both were… 
See more

5

 
bullet
Like
 
bullet
Reply
bullet
bullet
 
 
 
Thomas Alan Hanson
George Mason There are too many errors in your comment to warrant rebuttal. Lindzen and Happer are very well-respected scientists who have done research on the climate for several decades. When science is robust, no one cares who funds it. No one ever … 
See more

5

 
bullet
Like
 
bullet
Reply
bullet
bullet
 
 
Scott Stillwell
Folks have an interest in oil; because it is a product that works extremely well in free transportation and elsewhere, that no other tech can provide. It's only natural that threats to the market, like carbon offsets and propaganda would be met and countered by folks defending the market and their lives.
bullet
Like
 
bullet
Reply
bullet
bullet
Edited
bullet
 
 
Thank you for being more than a doctor
SUPINYANA.VERCEL.APP
Thank you for being more than a doctor

Thank you for being more than a doctor

 
 
bullet
Like
 
bullet
Reply
bullet
bullet
 
 
 
Scott Stillwell
Incorrect. The CO2 concentration has increased to over 400ppm from ~280ppm due to burning by man. The temperature(T) has risen ~0.34% and continues to climb for the reason just stated. That 0.3% rise represents the increase in energy available in weather events, ice melting, ect... except where phase change and precipitation is involved, which amounts to a ~4% increase in energy and total precipitation, which is an added 2MPH wind to a 100MPH wind that otherwise would have occurred and 0.04"water per inch that otherwise would have fell had man burnt nothing. So the hyperbole of, "crisis, catastrophic, devastating, ect...", does not apply; but the need to switch to power sources that will not contribute to the warming, such as nuclear is needed yesterday.
 
bullet
Like
 
bullet
Reply
bullet
bullet
 
 
 
Thomas Alan Hanson
Scott Stillwell I agree that we should switch to nuclear. Where I live, solar would not work (it snows almost every night in winter), and wind is unreliable. -- CO2 cannot be as potent as the so-called consensus claims -- there is a very weak correlation between CO2 levels and global temperatures. During the previous interglacial period (the Eemian), there was less atmospheric CO2 than there is now. But the earth was hotter than it is currently, and sea levels were extremely high -- so high that Scandinavia was an island. Many other examples could be adduced.
bullet
Like
 
bullet
Reply
bullet
bullet
 
 
 
George Mason
Scott Stillwell Yup, annual atmospheric CO2 peaked at 424 ppm this May. Temperature, however, has actually increased by 1.1 degrees C since reliable measurement started in the late 1800s.
bullet
Like
 
bullet
Reply
bullet
bullet
 
 
 
George Mason
Thomas Alan Hanson And the rise of the global temperature in the Eemian of 1 to 2 degrees C took almost 8,000 years based on ice core data. As did every other spike and fall in 800,000 years of ice core records. We've had a 1.1 degree C increase in less than 150 years. So please explain what natural process changed to alter a temperature rise of 8,000 years into on of hundreds of years. What could it be?
bullet
Like
 
bullet
Reply
bullet
bullet
 
 
 
Thomas Alan Hanson
Where do you get your information? I understand that 99.99% of Facebook users have no use for books, but you could at least use your computer. The climate has OFTEN changed MUCH more rapidly than it is changing now. Here are two dozen examples: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dansgaard-Oeschger_event
Dansgaard–Oeschger event - Wikipedia
EN.WIKIPEDIA.ORG
Dansgaard–Oeschger event - Wikipedia

Dansgaard–Oeschger event - Wikipedia

 
bullet
Like
 
bullet
Reply
bullet
bullet
 
 
 
Global Surface Temperature | NASA Global Climate Change
CLIMATE.NASA.GOV
Global Surface Temperature | NASA Global Climate Change

Global Surface Temperature | NASA Global Climate Change

 
bullet
Like
 
bullet
Reply
bullet
bullet
 
 
 
Scott Stillwell
The ~8000 year cycles covered a change an order of magnitude higher, ~10oC.
bullet
Like
 
bullet
Reply
bullet
 
 
bullet
 
 
Rod Pile
Thomas Alan Hanson Wrong The worldwide consensus is overwhelming. Scientific organizations that hold the position that Climate Change has been caused by human action:
List of Worldwide Scientific Organizations - Office of Planning and Research
OPR.CA.GOV
List of Worldwide Scientific Organizations - Office of Planning and Research

List of Worldwide Scientific Organizations - Office of Planning and Research

 
bullet
Like
 
bullet
Reply
bullet
 
bullet
 
Eric Matthew
You right wingers always seem to be so proud of your ignorance

11

 
bullet
Like
 
bullet
Reply
bullet
bullet
 
 
 
David C Allison
Eric Matthew Maybe they'll take the horse trank recommended by their orange fuhrer . If those scientists were real and looked at the same data, they couldn’t disagree. 99% is a big and dated number mr einstein. Why not just FOff and leave the problems for the Big People.
 
bullet
Like
 
bullet
Reply
bullet
bullet
Edited
bullet
 
 
 
John Nudge
David C Allison <--- Adolescent hiding in his mom's basement.

2

 
bullet
Like
 
bullet
Reply
bullet
bullet
 
 
 
David C Allison
John Nudge At 70 kid will you be like this? Or will you always be a misogynous bot?
bullet
Like
 
bullet
Reply
bullet
bullet
Edited
bullet
 
 
 
Les Arbuckle
David C Allison It wasn't a "Horse Trank" dummy. And Ivermectin was originall made for HUMANS.
How did you get so dumb? Practice?
Dr John Clauser lecture on climate and misinformation
YOUTUBE.COM
Dr John Clauser lecture on climate and misinformation

Dr John Clauser lecture on climate and misinformation

 
 
bullet
Like
 
bullet
Reply
bullet
bullet
 
 
 
David C Allison
Les Arbuckle Bait a fiskhook, you’ll catch more.
bullet
Like
 
bullet
Reply
bullet
bullet
 
 
 
Les Arbuckle
David C Allison Good try. That's a sharp debate strategy. You're a daisy.
bullet
Like
 
bullet
Reply
bullet
bullet
 
 
 
David C Allison
Les Arbuckle I remember a Dr. John. Singer. I wouldn't accept a proctology exam from that guy. So, stop.
bullet
Like
 
bullet
Reply
bullet
 
 
bullet
 
 
John Nudge
Eric Matthew <---Angry, but doesn't know why.
 
bullet
Like
 
bullet
Reply
bullet
bullet
 
 
bullet
Like
 
bullet
Reply
bullet
bullet
 
 
Koreen AW
Eric Matthew You left wingers always seem to be so proud of your alarmist predictions that never come to fruition.

2

 
bullet
Like
 
bullet
Reply
bullet
bullet
 
 
Dr John Clauser lecture on climate and misinformation
YOUTUBE.COM
Dr John Clauser lecture on climate and misinformation

Dr John Clauser lecture on climate and misinformation

 
bullet
Like
 
bullet
Reply
bullet
bullet
 
 
Michael Driskill
Eric Matthew ............and the unicorn you rode in on!!!!!!
bullet
Like
 
bullet
Reply
bullet
bullet
 
 
Scott Stillwell
Left wingers are oblivious to theirs and arrogant about it too.
bullet
Like
 
bullet
Reply
bullet
 
bullet
 
Ronn Einhaus
more Science Fiction.

8

 
bullet
Like
 
bullet
Reply
bullet
bullet
 
 
 
Jones Murphy
Ronn Einhaus what is your level of education in math(esp stats) & science, compared with the overwhelming majority of scientists who agree that global warming is real? Is evolution real? How about Covid? Are you vaccinated for Covid? Is Obama a US citizen?

2

 
bullet
Like
 
bullet
Reply
bullet
bullet
 
 
 
Sam Davis
Jones Murphy I bet you worship al gore too??
 
bullet
Like
 
bullet
Reply
bullet
bullet
 
 
 
Jones Murphy
Sam Davis bro I taught myself calculus as a kid. At what age did you teach yourself calculus? Do you have any idea how scientists even think? You think we sit around waiting for Al Gore to tell us about the universe?
 
bullet
Like
 
bullet
Reply
bullet
bullet
 
 
 
Sam Davis
Jones Murphy yes scientist think how can I get more money from any kind of agenda that they can milk????
 
bullet
Like
 
bullet
Reply
bullet
bullet
 
 
Jones Murphy
Sam Davis no worries. Big Oil, Gas, Coal CEO's will save us from the greedy, evil scientists
 
bullet
Like
 
bullet
Reply
bullet
 
bullet
John Cearley
Mother Jones? LMAO!!!

10

 
bullet
Like
 
bullet
Reply
bullet
 
bullet
 
Rich Branch
You idiots just cannot get over that this whole "climate change" crap is just that...CRAP!!! It's a globalist SCAM you morons!

10

 
bullet
Like
 
bullet
Reply
bullet
bullet
 
 
John Nudge
Rich Branch These losers still can't admit that Al Gore scammed them big time, and is still scamming them. There never was a concensus., and none of his dire predictions have come true. Gore was smart to target the shallow end of the gene pool. The ultimate science deniers.

6

 
bullet
Like
 
bullet
Reply
bullet