Follow FACTUAL NEWS on

Questions?

Facebook Screen Shots of posts on the Climate Emergency

the Dunning–Kruger effect is a cognitive bias in which people mistakenly assess their cognitive ability as greater than it is.
It is related to the cognitive bias of illusory superiority and comes from the inability of people to recognize their lack of ability.
And consistently believe they know more than the experts or faithfully believe non-experts.

Facebook Fired An Employee Who Collected Evidence Of Right-Wing Pages Getting Preferential Treatment
All that needs to happen is for someone (probably a Propaganda Mill Monitor)  to REPORT a comment to Facebook and
Facebook, ( ignoring the quality of the comment) looks at the commenter and if he/she is relatively new  --
 immediately bans that user with the pretext of "SUSPICIOUS ACTIVITY".
Few comments, (even tho they link to REPUTABLE STUDIES reported in the New York Times, Washington Post, NASA, MIT, PHYS.org.....),
 rebutting the false or misleading propaganda, --- survive Facebook's Preferential Treatment. 


 

==================================================


==================================================

==================================================

==================================================

==================================================

==================================================


 

==================================================

==================================================

==================================================

 







==================================================

==================================================

==================================================

==================================================

==================================================

==================================================

 

 

==================================================

   
          

ENVIRONMENT and CLIMATE EMERGENCY REBUTTALS

In 2015, reducing environmental risks could have prevented more than a quarter of the 5.9 million deaths of children under 5 years.
 https://www.who.int/features/factfiles/children_environmental_health/en/

Scientific consensus: Climate is warming from man-made change.
I wish it weren't true but I'd be very silly not to believe 99% of scientists.
Seven Answers to Climate Contrarian Nonsense
http://www.scientificamerican.com/article/seven-answers-to-climate-contrarian-nonsense/
http://climate.nasa.gov/scientific-consensus/
https://www.skepticalscience.com/argument.php

I think I'll go with the 12,000 academic papers https://www.theguardian.com/science/2019/jul/24/scientific-consensus-on-humans-causing-global-warming-passes-99

And NASA https://climate.nasa.gov/scientific-consensus/

After a study of 12,000 papers from here https://iopscience.iop.org/journal/1748-9326  “There was 99% scientific consensus in 2011 that humans are causing global warming.”

2019 STUDY: Pennsylvania, Ohio, Wisconsin, Michigan, Illinois, Indiana, West Virginia, New Jersey, Maryland, and Delaware  could see $4.7 billion in health benefits in 2030 if they stick with current renewable energy standards, according to a new study from MIT. That’s about a 34% return on the $3.5 billion price tag associated with actually building out that infrastructure of renewable energy sources such as wind or solar farms.
THIS RESEARCH SHOWS THAT RENEWABLES PAY FOR THEMSELVES through health benefits alone.
 https://www.theverge.com/2019/8/15/20807800/renewable-energy-health-benefits-research-mit-study-rust-belt

- the study was done by no less than the Massachusetts Institute of Technology !

No, 31,000 scientists have not said climate change is a hoax
https://www.snopes.com/fact-check/30000-scientists-reject-climate-change/ 

The cost of doing nothing – or falling short of the ambitious goals – is greater than whatever sticker shock the Green New Deal might cause voters.
“Economists estimate that if we do not take action, we will lose $34.5 trillion in economic activity by the end of the century,” Sanders said.
“And the benefits are enormous: by taking bold and decisive action, we will save:-
--- $2.9 trillion over 10 years,
--- $21 trillion over 30 years, and
--- $70.4 trillion over 80 years.”

The trees and plants of the Amazon forest pull carbon dioxide out of the atmosphere as part of photosynthesis. Destruction of the forest releases carbon stored in the trees and reduces the amount of carbon dioxide used by them.
“The Amazon forest holds something like 90 billion tons of carbon, and if that ends up in the atmosphere it’s not a good thing,”
https://www.washingtonpost.com/climate-environment/what-you-need-to-know-about-the-amazon-rainforest-fires/2019/08/27/ac82b21e-c815-11e9-a4f3-c081a126de70_story.html

NOAA: The warmest month overall in the 140-year NOAA global temperature dataset record. The year-to-date temperature for 2019 tied with 2017 as the second warmest January–July on record. https://www.ncei.noaa.gov/news/global-climate-201907

The cost of renewable energy has tumbled even further over the past year, to the point where almost every source of green energy can now compete on cost with oil, coal and gas-fired power plants. https://www.forbes.com/sites/dominicdudley/2019/05/29/renewable-energy-costs-tumble/#1d0e389ae8ce
The only thing stopping it is POLITICAL WILL the technology already exists ( electrical storage will improve , hydrogen fuel cells , pumped hydro and batteries, )

The estimated cost of measures to limit Earth-warming greenhouse gas emissions can be more than offset by reductions in deaths and disease from air pollution, https://phys.org/news/2018-03-health-outweigh-limiting-global.html#jCp

The average cost of developing new power plants based on onshore wind, solar photovoltaic (PV), biomass or geothermal energy is now usually below $0.10/kWh. Wind costs $0.13/kWh. Power plants based on fossil fuels such as oil and gas,  range from $0.05/kWh to over $0.15/kWh.

Dorian’s appearance made 2019 the fourth straight year in which a Category 5 hurricane formed in the Atlantic — the longest such streak on record, Heat in the ocean is a hurricane’s primary source of fuel, and the world’s oceans have absorbed more than 90 percent of the warming of the past 50 years. https://www.climate.gov/news-features/understanding-climate/climate-change-ocean-heat-content

Heat in the ocean is a storm’s primary source of fuel, and the world’s oceans have absorbed more than 90 percent of the warming of the past 50 years. https://www.climate.gov/news-features/understanding-climate/climate-change-ocean-heat-content

Health savings outweigh costs of limiting global warming: study https://phys.org/news/2018-03-health-outweigh-limiting-global.html#jCp

Wind turbines kill far fewer birds in North America than do cats or collisions with cell towers. Wind turbines kill between 214,000 and 368,000 birds annually — a small fraction compared with the estimated 6.8 million communication towers , 57 million power lines , 214 million vehicles, 624 million from  glass windows each year,  and the 1.4 billion to 3.7 billion deaths from cats, https://www.usatoday.com/story/money/business/2014/09/15/wind-turbines-kill-fewer-birds-than-cell-towers-cats/15683843/  https://www.3billionbirds.org/findings

Since that flawed 2015 Study, the bulk of scientific research suggests that Antarctica is losing more ice than it's gaining. A 2018 study that used the GRACE satellites to show that ice gains in East Antarctica haven't kept up with ice losses in the west, and that melting ice has added nearly 3 trillion gallons of water to the oceans over the course of 25 years. https://bigthink.com/politics-current-affairs/2015-nasa-study-antarctic-ice-climate-change-skeptic?rebelltitem=5#rebelltitem5

A 2016 Union of Concerned Scientists study(pdf) found that the manufacture and operation of electric vehicles produced less than half the carbon emissions of comparable petrol and diesel-powered vehicles. But this calculation assumes energy used in manufacture does not itself come from renewables.  https://www.ucsusa.org/sites/default/files/attach/2015/11/Cleaner-Cars-from-Cradle-to-Grave-full-report.pdf#page=13

This was debunked years ago ! On the one hand we have a bunch of 49 former administrators, astronauts, and engineers who between them have zero climate expertise and zero climate science publications. 
On the other hand we have the climate scientists at NASA GISS who between them have decades, perhaps even centuries of combined professional climate research experience, and hundreds, perhaps even thousands of peer-reviewed climate science publications. https://skepticalscience.com/NASA-climate-denialist-letter.html