David Horowitz
supporters take over the White
House Administration:- Jeff Sessions, Bannon,
Vice President Pence, Reince Priebus, Kellyanne
Conway, Steve Miller (senior policy adviser) and at least six others !
- Stephen Miller - Horowitz's Protege
- The
Freedom
Center's war against the Left
- No IRS regulation of
Freedom Center's Political Activities
- Horowitz joins with
Bannon(financed by
Mercer) to
indoctrinate against THE LEFT and the
ESTABLISHMENT
- The Freedom Center and its supporters attack Democrats, Global
Warming and Immigration
- Freedom Center populates the Whitehouse
The crowd rose to its feet and roared its approval as Sen.
Jeff Sessions bounded onto the stage at the
Breakers, an exclusive resort in Palm Beach, Fla.
Stephen Miller, an aide to the Alabama Republican, handed him a glass
trophy honoring his bravery as a lawmaker. “Heyyyy!”
Sessions yelled out to the crowd.
The ceremony that day, in November 2014, turned out to be a
harbinger: It brought together an array of hard-right activists and a
little-known charity whose ideas would soon move
from the fringes of the conservative movement
into the heart of the nation’s government.
The man behind the event was David
Horowitz, a former ’60s radical who became an intellectual godfather
to the far right through his writings and his work at a charity, the
David Horowitz Freedom Center. Since its
formation in 1988, the Freedom Center has helped cultivate a generation of political
warriors seeking to upend the Washington establishment. These warriors
include some of the most powerful and influential figures in the
Trump administration: Attorney General
Sessions, senior policy adviser
Miller and White House chief strategist Stephen
K. Bannon.
Long before Trump promised to
build a wall, ban Muslims
and abandon the Paris climate
accord, Horowitz
used his tax-exempt group to rail against illegal immigrants, the spread of
Islam and global warming. Center officials described
Hillary Clinton as evil,
President Barack Obama as a secret
communist and the
Democratic Party as a front for enemies of the
United States.
The Freedom Center has declared
itself a “School for Political Warfare,” and it
is part of a loose nationwide network of like-minded charities linked
together by ideology, personalities, conservative funders and websites,
including the for-profit Breitbart News.
Horowitz’s story shows how
charities have become essential to modern political campaigns, amid lax
enforcement of the federal limits on their involvement in politics, while
taking advantage of millions of dollars in what amount to taxpayer
subsidies.
In interviews with The Washington Post,
Horowitz, 78, acknowledged the
Freedom Center’s partisan
mission and said its aim is to protect “traditional American values”
against adversaries on the left, who operate their own network of charities.
“This is a shadow political universe,” he said.
The Freedom Center's war against
the Left
By 2006, Horowitz’s charity, now operating as the
David Horowitz Freedom Center, was staging
events, publishing books and pamphlets, and operating a website devoted to
“news on the war at home and abroad” against the
left.
That same year, Horowitz wrote “The
Shadow Party: How George Soros, Hillary Clinton, and Sixties Radicals
Seized Control of the Democratic Party.” He and a co-writer argued
that Soros, a hedge fund billionaire, was a
“political manipulator” who financed a vast movement on the left, with
help from charities and other nonprofit groups.
The Freedom Center stepped up
its anti-Islamic rhetoric, sponsoring an “Islamofascism Awareness Week” on
college campuses. Horowitz accused U.S. college campuses of fostering “Jew
hatred” and supporting Islamist militant terror.
It also formed an alliance with another charity called
Jihad Watch, which would become a leading
voice in calling for restrictions on Muslim immigrants.
“Our work at Jihad Watch
relates to dispelling falsehoods and disinformation spread by
The Washington Post and others regarding the
motivating ideology, nature and magnitude of the jihad threat worldwide
and within the U.S.,” the group’s chief, Robert Spencer, told
The Post in a statement last month.
In the 2000s, the Freedom Center
continued receiving millions in support from conservative donors, more
than $4 million annually. The election of
Barack Obama in 2008 provided an extra boost
to fundraising.
It also affirmed the center’s belief that “the
political left has declared war on America
and its constitutional system, and is willing to
collaborate with America’s enemies abroad,” according to the
center’s website. “For most of those years the Center was a voice crying
in the wilderness with few willing to recognize the threat from the enemy
within, a fifth column force that was steadily expanding its influence
within the Democratic Party.”
This was all too much for some prominent mainstream
conservatives such as William Kristol and
George Will, who formerly sat on the board of
the Bradley Foundation. “Some people seem not
to feel fully alive unless they are furious,” Will
wrote in an email to The Post. [Will writes a twice-weekly column for The Post]
“Perhaps this is because they gain derivative significance from the
feeling that they are personally involved in momentous events.”
|
|
He has authored a book that accuses
Democrats of a War against Christianity. Trying to indoctrinate the
Religious Right. This jew doesn't give a damn about
Christianity. His sole goal is to stop working Americans from electing a
Democratic Representative to Congress.
The lefty Horowitz moves Right, -
to the anti-Democrat
Freedom Center
Horowitz looks like a professor,
with a salt-and-pepper goatee and small oval glasses. He speaks with a
scratchy voice that carries strong hints of his New York roots. He is quick
to use fiery rhetoric and no-holds-barred tactics he had learned as a
student radical.
Horowitz was a “red diaper baby”
of communist parents in New York City. After attending Columbia University
in the 1950s, he enrolled as a graduate student at the
University of California at Berkeley, an anchor of leftist thinking.
Over the next two decades, he took on prominent roles in the
New Left. He served as an editor of Ramparts,
an influential muckraking magazine in San Francisco.
But by the late 1970s, he had decided that the left
represented a profound threat to the United States. On March 17, 1985, he
and a writing partner came out as conservatives in a surprising
Washington Post Magazine article headlined “Lefties for Reagan.”
In August 1988, Horowitz
launched the Center for the Study of Popular Culture
in Los Angeles, a nonprofit group that would become the
Freedom Center.
Trump wouldn’t be President
if not for Robert Mercer
Stephen Miller - Horowitz's Protege
April 2020 measures were under consideration that would
restrict guest worker programs, but the “the most important thing is to turn
off the faucet of new immigrant labor,” Miller said
After the Sept. 11, 2001, terrorist attacks, Horowitz and his
center argued that liberals had been too
tolerant of radical Islam and illegal immigration.
Open to that message was Stephen Miller,
a 16-year-old high school student in Santa Monica, Calif. In the fall of
2001, Miller asked Horowitz for help in
disputes with administrators at his school. Miller
complained his teachers and classmates were insufficiently patriotic and
refused to say the Pledge of Allegiance.
Horowitz’s charity launched a group called
Students for Academic Freedom, framing it as a
counterweight to the dominance of the left in high schools and on college
campuses. Miller formed a chapter and sought
permission from school officials to invite Horowitz to the school to speak.
When administrators delayed, Miller and
Horowitz accused them of stifling free speech.
Horowitz eventually spoke at the school, and in November
2002, Miller wrote about the visit in an essay
in Frontpagemag.com,
the online news and opinion site run by the center.
Miller portrayed himself as the victim of indoctrination and called
on the system’s superintendent to ensure “that his schools stress inclusive
patriotism, rather than a multiculturalism.”
When Miller went on to Duke
University, he formed another chapter of Students for
Academic Freedom and again invited Horowitz to speak. At the time,
Horowitz had just published “The Professors: The 101
Most Dangerous Academics in America,” a book some condemned as a
political blacklist.
After graduation, Miller wanted
to work in Washington. Horowitz reached out to conservatives on Capitol Hill
who had supported his group. He helped Miller land jobs with four lawmakers,
including former representative Michele Bachmann
(R-Minn.) and Sessions. “I highly recommended
him to Jeff,” Horowitz told
The Post.
Miller did not respond to requests for
interviews. |
No IRS regulation of Freedom Center's
Political Activities
The Freedom Center was among a
growing group of allied charities that received funding from large,
conservative foundations such as Donors Capital
Fund, Donors Trust, the Bradley Foundation
and the Scaife family. For decades,
those foundations and others had financed nonprofit organizations that
promoted free enterprise and small government and
opposed the environmental movement and other issues favored by progressives.
In general, charities have been able
to operate with little scrutiny by regulators. The number of
enforcement officials at the IRS and the
audits they conduct have dwindled over the past decade. The
IRS became especially reluctant to enforce
limitations on political activity, following a furious backlash from
conservatives and Republicans in Congress in 2013 over allegations the
agency was illegally targeting tea party
groups seeking tax-exempt status. An IRS
spokesman declined to comment.
Cleta Mitchell, a lawyer, Bradley
Foundation board member and recipient of a Freedom Center award,
said conservative charities “take great pains to stay within their lanes
from a legal perspective.”
Matthew Vadum, senior vice president of the tax-exempt
Capital Research Center and a prolific
contributor to the Freedom Center’s Frontpagemag.com,
said there is no question the conservative charities
work in concert. But the IRS rules are
open to interpretation and unclear about the limits, he said.
“It’s a network,” Vadum said. “[C]onservative activist
groups try to push the envelope. And it’s not
always clear how far they should go.”
Ron Robinson, president of Young
America’s Foundation and another ally of the
Freedom Center, said ideological alliances and shared financial
support are commonplace across the political spectrum, not just on the
right. “This is a reality of the modern world,” Robinson said. “I don’t
view it as pernicious. They make it possible to enrich the world of
ideas.”
By 2008, the Freedom Center
had assumed a leading role in the hard-right branch of the network,
spending $2.7 million on seminars and
meetings that routinely attracted the luminaries of the conservative
movement.
The most popular of these annual gatherings was “David
Horowitz’s Restoration Weekend,”
which was often held at the Breakers in Palm Beach, a stunning hotel
complex modeled on the Medici palaces of Renaissance Italy.
These were lavish affairs. In November 2009, the center
paid $438,000 to produce the event at the
Breakers, an IRS filing shows. That covered
well-produced videos and cocktail parties and, for major donors, spa and
golf privileges. |
|
Charities have been around since the nation’s beginning, as
citizens sought to help schools, churches and the poor. Decades ago,
Congress created a special section of the IRS
code to define and regulate charities, which are known as 501(c)(3) groups
under the code. They have a special allure for donors: They can deduct
contributions from their taxes.
IRS rules give charities wide
latitude, but they may not devote a “substantial part” of their resources
or activities to lobbying or “carrying on propaganda.” And they “are
absolutely prohibited from directly or indirectly participating in, or
intervening in, any political campaign on behalf of (or in opposition to)
any candidate for elective public office,” according to the
IRS.
In his IRS application for
tax-exempt status in August 1988, Horowitz
wrote his center would be “entirely non-profit, non-partisan,” according
to records obtained through a public records request. “It will not be
organized to promote any particular political program.”
Twenty years later, a brochure for one of the charity’s
events would sharply contradict that claim: “In 1988,
Horowitz created the
Center for the Study of Popular Culture to institutionalize his
campaigns against the Left and its
anti-American agendas.”
Horowitz makes a good living
as the Freedom Center chief executive,
earning $583,000 from a charity that received
$5.4 million in donations in 2015, according to the latest available
records. But he said he has come to believe that his group and others
across the political spectrum ought to be reined in to ensure they fulfill
the original spirit of the Internal Revenue
Service’s charitable rules, even though such overhauls would be
“personally devastating for me.”
“They should redefine what a charity is,” he said. “A
charity should be something that helps everybody.”
The IRS prohibits charities
from directly or indirectly participating in political campaigns, for or
against candidates.
In an essay he published online in response to The
Post’s questions after refusing further
interviews, Horowitz wrote the center “does
not engage in political activities in the narrow sense used in the
I.R.S. code.” |
Horowitz joins with Bannon(financed
by Mercer) to indoctrinate against
THE LEFT and the ESTABLISHMENT
A marquee event that weekend
was the Citizens United Film Festival. It
included a documentary written and directed by
Bannon about the ravages of the financial meltdown called “Generation Zero.” The
Citizens United Foundation, another conservative tax-exempt
charity, would soon pay Bannon hundreds of
thousands for fundraising and film consulting.
Bannon was becoming an
important ally for Horowitz and a pivotal figure in the growing network.
Bannon and a partner once suggested including
Horowitz in a proposed documentary to be called “Destroying
the Great Satan: The Rise of Islamic Fascism in America.” The
movie’s draft outline warned of an Islamic takeover of the United States.
In March 2012, Bannon was
named the executive chairman of the online Breitbart
News site, following the unexpected death of his friend and
collaborator, Andrew Breitbart. Bannon
immediately began steering the site even deeper into the
anti-establishment movement.
On Nov. 12, 2013, Bannon
hosted a book party for Horowitz at a Washington, D.C., townhouse that
served as Breitbart’s capital office and
Bannon’s living quarters. Horowitz had just
published a compendium of anti-liberal
writings called the “Black Book of the American
Left.”
As Horowitz mingled, Bannon
introduced himself to Ronald Radosh, a prominent conservative intellectual
and historian. Radosh had known Horowitz for a half-century and also
worked his way through the ranks of the New Left before becoming a
conservative. “I’m Steve Bannon and this is my house,” Bannon said,
according to an account that Radosh wrote about for the
Daily Beast in August and
discussed with The Post. “I’m a Leninist,” Bannon
said, according to Radosh. “Lenin wanted to destroy
the state, and that’s my goal, too. I want to bring everything crashing
down, and destroy all of today’s establishment.” |
|
From the start, Horowitz was supported by
contributions from stalwart conservative groups, including the
John M. Olin Foundation and the
Lynde and Harry Bradley Foundation, along
with donations from the wealthy Scaife family
of Pittsburgh.
In 1989, he co-wrote “Destructive Generation: Second
Thoughts About the Sixties,” a harsh critique
of the radical left. He also began hosting events. A gathering
called the Wednesday Morning Club catered to
conservatives in liberal Los Angeles. In the 1990s, one of the regular
guests was Bannon, then a former Wall Street
investor seeking to make his mark in Hollywood, according to Lionel
Chetwynd, the event’s co-founder.
“Conservatives are nervous around me, and they’re nervous because I’m very
outspoken,” Horowitz told
The Post. “Steve Bannon
was not nervous because he’s like me.”
Bannon did not respond to requests for interviews. |
A few days later, Horowitz traveled to Palm Beach to host
another Restoration Weekend at the Breakers.
Bannon was going, too — in part to raise money
for a documentary film about Horowitz. Bannon
said he needed $1 million and there were few venues better for finding wealthy
donors. As it happened, Bannon could not raise
the money, according to two attendees who heard his pitch. But he received an
unexpected gift. It came from Patrick Caddell, a veteran Democratic pollster
who had once worked for President Jimmy Carter.
He was speaking about his recent study and POLL
of Americans’ sentiments toward Washington, the economy
and the nation’s future. He said
Americans were feeling glum:
Two-thirds blamed self-serving elites in both parties
for their troubles. They craved an outsider to shake things up. His findings thrilled the crowd,
Caddell told The Post in a lengthy interview. He earlier gave a similar
account to the New Yorker.
Caddell said Bannon arranged for a
private briefing the next day, to include
Robert and Rebekah Mercer,
a hedge fund billionaire and his daughter. For two years,
Bannon had worked with the Mercers, who invested
millions in Breitbart News. The family also
helped Bannon launch a Florida-based charity
called the Government Accountability Institute,
which describes itself as a nonpartisan investigative organization.
Bannon and the Mercers
huddled with Caddell in a second-floor lounge at the Breakers. The
Mercers were entranced by what they were hearing,
Caddell told The Post, and
Bannon “was ecstatic.” “Being a basic rabble-rouser, it fit his views,”
Caddell said.
Robert Mercer asked Caddell to
confirm the poll’s findings, offering to
pay the costs. Caddell told The Post the
follow-up poll did just that. The
charities and their media allies began to coalesce around the discontent that
Caddell documented. “You don’t find a lot of cooperation between conservative
groups, but now this network, we have
Breitbart,
Drudge . . . ” Horowitz told the 2013
Restoration Weekend attendees, according to video of the speech. “It’s
going to be very, very powerful over time.”
The Freedom Center and its supporters attack Democrats, Global Warming and
Immigration
By late 2013, the Freedom Center
barely resembled the charity the IRS had approved for
tax exemption. When it began, he told the IRS
that it planned to serve the “broad public community as an educational
institution.” Now it was openly involved in fighting a
political war with the left. “You can counter their attacks by turning
their guns around,” Horowitz said in a speech at the time. “You can neutralize
them by fighting fire with fire.”
Among the center’s targets was climate change, which
it attacked repeatedly as a ruse by the
left. Frontpagemag.com writers made fun of global warming
in stories with headlines such as “New Study Says Global
Warming Is Good For Polar Bears” and “Global
Warming Ended in 1996.” (The truth -- there
was no
“leveling off of warming” over the past two decades)
Scientists just published an entire study refuting Scott Pruitt there was no
"leveling off of warming" .
The site also ran stories insinuating that
Democrats were cooperating with Islamist militants: “Jihad
Migrating to Red States — With Obama’s Blessing,”
“The Left’s Embrace of Islamic Rape,” and “ ‘Sanctuary Cities’ or ‘Safe Havens’ for Terrorists?”
In March 2014, the center made the
first of $175,000 in contributions to the Party for
Freedom, a group founded by Geert Wilders, one of Europe’s most ardent
anti-Muslim politicians, according to documents released by the
Dutch government and originally described by the
New York Times and the
Intercept. He was campaigning on a platform of preventing the
“Islamization of the Netherlands,” proposing a ban on Muslim immigration and
the shuttering of mosques.
Later that year, Wilders spoke at
Restoration Weekend. “The truth is that our own Western culture — based
on Christianity, based on Judaism and humanism — is far superior, far
superior, than the Islamic culture that immigrants have adopted,” Wilders said
to applause.
On hand that weekend was Jeff Sessions,
a regular at the annual retreat. He was honored with a glass trophy for
helping to derail a bipartisan bill aimed at
overhauling U.S. immigration law. He acknowledged Horowitz from the
stage. “I’ve seen some great people receive this, David.
And it’s a special treat and pleasure for me, David,
because you know how much I admire you as we battle for right and justice and
law,” Sessions said. Later that night,
Sessions and Miller
went to a lounge at the resort. Joining them was Ann
Coulter, another regular and a contributor to Frontpagemag.com. She was writing a
book called “Adios, America: The Left’s Plan to Turn Our
Country into a Third World Hellhole.” As Sessions
sipped on a drink, she and
Miller batted around ideas about how to crack down on
immigration until long after midnight. “There was
obviously a major meeting of the minds,” said one person in the lounge at the
time who spoke on the condition of anonymity out of fear of repercussions.
“They thought immigration was the single most
important issue in the country.” Coulter did not respond to requests for
comment.
Freedom
Center supporters
Sessions, Bannon, Vice President Pence, Reince
Priebus, Kellyanne Conway and at least six others
in the Whitehouse
As the presidential campaign heated up, Horowitz’s group and
the conservative network shifted into high gear. “Hillary
Clinton May Go to Prison,” said a
Breitbart headline in August 2015, when
Bannon was still its chief. That same month,
Frontpagemag.com ran stories titled “Hillary Under Siege” and “The
Last Days of Hillary.”
Peter Schweizer, president of the
Government Accountability Institute, Bannon’s
charity, published “Clinton Cash,” a
searing critique of Bill and
Hillary Clinton’s foundation and personal
enrichment. Schweizer worked with Bannon as an
editor at large at Breitbart, and the two men
were preparing to make a documentary based on the book.
For his part, Horowitz fired off contentious remarks about the
race at every turn, and not only about Hillary Clinton.
He also denounced the Republicans who branded themselves “Never
Trump.” In May 2016, when it became clear
Trump would be the Republican nominee, he called
conservative columnist William Kristol a
“Republican spoiler” and “renegade Jew” in Breitbart
News because of his opposition to Trump.
“To weaken the only party that stands between the Jews and their annihilation,
and between America and the forces intent on destroying her, is a political
miscalculation so great and a betrayal so profound as to not be easily
forgiven,” Horowitz wrote. The article created an uproar, with some critics
accusing the Jewish Horowitz of making anti-Semitic remarks. In response to
questions from The Post, Kristol played down the
episode and dismissed Horowitz as a bombastic self-promoter. “David is an
angry man. He thinks he’s been denied the power and recognition he deserves.
So he lashes out. I shudder to think of David’s rage
when he realizes he’s been taken for a ride by a con man,”
Kristol said. “I look forward to the day when
American conservatism regains its moral health and political sanity, and the
David Horowitz center is
back on the fringe, where I’m afraid it belongs.”
But the Freedom Center and others
in the network were rising on the Trump tide. The
campaign named Bannon the chief executive, David
Bossie of Citizens United the vice president and
Miller an adviser. In August, Horowitz took
advantage of his ties to the campaign to offer a proposal for spending
billions on school vouchers for poor, largely
minority children — who Horowitz said had been underserved by
Democrats. Miller
made sure it became part of Trump’s platform —
along with a proposed ban on Muslims, a border wall
and other ideas long supported by the Freedom Center
and its ideological allies.
On Dec. 14, 2016, during a videotaped event, Horowitz expressed
happiness about Trump’s victory and said
Republicans had finally woken up to his approach to politics. He pulled from
his suit coat a piece of paper listing
Freedom Center supporters
already in the administration. “It’s quite an
impressive list,” Horowitz said, rattling off the names:
Sessions, Bannon, Vice President Pence,
Reince Priebus, Kellyanne Conway and at least six
others. “My personal favorite is Steve Miller,
because Steve, who was today appointed the
senior policy adviser in the White House
. . . is a kind of protege of mine,” he said. “So the
center
has a big stake in this administration.” The White House and Justice
Department did not respond to requests for comment. Two weeks later, the
Freedom Center named Bannon
its Man of the Year.
“Over the years people would refer to my
Freedom Center as a ‘think tank’ and I would correct them, ‘No, it’s a
battle tank,’ because that is what I felt was missing most in the conservative
cause — troops ready and willing to fight fire with fire,” Horowitz wrote in
Breitbart in February. “The
Trump administration may be only a few weeks old, but it is already
clear that the new White House is a
battle tank.”
source
Robert O'Harrow Jr. and Shawn Boburg June
3 2017
Washington Post
|